Rethinking EOY Reviews: Effectively Prepare Students by Reversing Gradual Release

Reversing GRR Banner

As the school year winds down and end-of-course exams and final assessments loom, it’s natural to want to jump into a full-blown end-of-year teaching review of everything students have learned. 

However, the key to effective EOY reviews isn’t simply re-teaching everything but targeting the appropriate level of instruction students need at the end of the year to succeed independently. 

This idea of assessing students first, at their “You Do Alone” level, is how educators can ensure that review is strategic and timely.   

The Gradual Release (GRR) model, traditionally starts with direct instruction (“I Do”) followed by scaffolded practice (“We Do” and “You Do Together”) before students work independently (“You Do Alone”).

gradual release model teacher is responsible

However, for effective review, we can flip this script.

Why Reverse the Release?

Review is about assessing student mastery and providing targeted support. By starting with independent work (“You Do Alone”), we see what students can do on their own. This allows us to tailor instruction to their specific needs, not rehash everything.

reverse gradual release model student is responsible

Here’s how the Reverse Gradual Release helps assess student mastery and target support effectively:

1. You Do Alone: Assessing Independence

The review period begins with a “You Do Alone” approach. Present students with a task or practice exam questions that reflect the learning goals covered throughout the year. This allows us to gauge their independent understanding and identify areas needing additional support.

Example: Math

  • Provide a mixed practice worksheet covering various fraction operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division).
  • Offer a word problem that requires students to translate real-world scenarios into mathematical equations and solve for the unknown.

2. Assess and Group

Analyze student work. Group students based on their level of mastery – those who excelled (“You Do Alone”), those who need additional collaboration and practice (“You Do Together”), and those needing more direct instruction (“We Do” or even “I Do”).

3. You Do Together: Collaborative Problem Solving

After the “You Do Alone” assessment, students who encountered challenges benefit from collaborative learning. In the “You Do Together” stage, students work in pairs or small groups, tackling similar problems and discussing their approaches. Peer interaction can often clarify concepts and provide alternative perspectives.

do together collaborative problem solving

Example: Science

  • Divide students into groups to complete a “gallery walk” activity. Each station features a scientific concept (e.g., phases of matter, cell types) with related questions. Students collaborate to answer the questions and learn from each other’s explanations.

4. We Do: Focused Instruction for Common Misconceptions

Following the “You Do Together” stage, the teacher facilitates a “We Do” session. Here, the focus is on addressing common misconceptions or challenges identified during independent and collaborative work. Present a few problems on the board, working through the thought process step-by-step.

Example: Social Studies

  • Briefly review key events and figures from a specific historical period (e.g., American Revolution), highlighting common student errors observed in the previous assessments.
  • Lead the class through a sample primary source analysis (e.g., analyzing a political cartoon) to demonstrate critical thinking skills required for the exam.

5. I Do: Targeted Intervention for Struggling Learners

Finally, the “I Do” stage caters to students who still require significant support. This might involve a mini-lesson where the teacher explicitly models solving a problem type or concept.

Example: English Language Arts

  • Conduct a “think-aloud” session, reading a passage aloud while verbalizing your thought process as you identify key ideas, analyze the author’s craft, or prepare for a writing prompt.

6. Reassessment:

Implement another “You Do Alone” activity to gauge progress and address any remaining gaps.

Benefits of Reverse Gradual Release:

  • Efficient Use of Time: Identify student strengths and weaknesses quickly, focusing support where it’s most needed.
  • Empowering Student Learning: Students take ownership of their learning by working independently and collaboratively.
  • Targeted Instruction: Provides focused support based on specific student needs, not a one-size-fits-all approach.
  • Reduced Test Anxiety: Students practice applying skills in a low-stakes environment before the final assessment.

Remember:

  • The goal of the “You Do Alone” stage is not to assign a grade but to assess mastery.
  • This is a flexible framework. Adapt the stages and examples to fit your specific content area and student needs.

By reversing the Gradual Release of Responsibility model, we assess students’ mastery first, allowing them to demonstrate their understanding and pinpoint areas where they might need more targeted support. This strategic approach ensures that valuable review time is spent as an active learning experience that empowers students to a deeper understanding and prepares them for success on their end-of-course assessments and beyond.

EOY Review Questions to Ponder: 

  • Reflect on your curriculum pacing and student performance data throughout the year. How can you leverage this information to design effective “You Do Alone” assessments that target key learning goals for review?
  • What specific evidence will you look for to determine student mastery and areas needing further support?
  • Reflect on your preferred methods for grouping students during the “You Do Together” stage. How will you ensure productive collaboration and address diverse learning needs within groups?
  • How can technology be leveraged to create engaging and interactive “You Do Alone” activities or formative assessments?

Actions to Take: 

  • During a PLC or other collaborative planning opportunities, work with colleagues to:
    • Devise clear criteria for evaluating student work during each stage of the Reverse Gradual Release process.
    • Plan formative assessments or practice exams that target key learning goals for the end of the year. This could include a mix of question formats and tasks to gauge student understanding across different skills.
    • Gather resources reteaching the learning goals during the “We Do” and “I Do” stages. including graphic organizers, scaffolding tools, or mini lessons. It is important to avoid reteaching the goals using the same lessons. New content and experiences are a must if remediation is to be effective. 

Lindsey Hampton

During her 20+ years in education, Lindsey has been an elementary and secondary classroom teacher, an instructional coach, and a specialist in teacher induction. She has collaborated with teachers and administrators nationwide to develop learning partnerships that focus on evaluating and implementing High Yield Instructional Strategies. Her instructional coach and specialist background have led her to the philosophy that improvement must be viewed as a continuum, a means to refine and adapt the improvement of instructional practices continually. She has presented this theme and many others on teaching and learning at numerous conferences in FL, KY, TN, NC, and PA. Her contributions to Learning-Focused include developing new resources and workshops, providing leadership and instructional training and coaching.

Leave a Comment